Analysis II
Riemann-Stieltjes Integration: Additional Results

Theorem. Suppose that f and a are both continuous and non-decreasing, then

ó
õ
b

a
 
f  da = f(b)a(b) - f(a)a(a) - ó
õ
b

a
 
a df.
P: = {x0 : = a < x1 < ¼ < xi-1 < xi < ¼ < b = : xn}
R(P;x,f,a) = f(b)a(b) - f(a)a(a) - R(P;,a,f).
n
å
j = 1 
uj (vj-vj-1) = unvn -u0v0 - n
å
j = 1 
vj-1(uj-uj-1)

Theorem.  If a is monotone increasing on [a,b] and f is bounded, then f is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a on[a,b] if and only if f  is Riemann integrable. In this case,

ó
õ
b

a
 
f  da = ó
õ
b

a
 
fdx
n
å
1 
f(si) Dai
=    n
å
1 
f(si) (ti) Dxi
£    n
å
1 
|f(si)| |a¢(ti) -(si)| Dxi + U(P;f )
£   ||f||¥  (U(P,)-L(P,)) + U(P;f )
£   ||f||¥  e+ U(P;f ).
U(P;f,a) - U(P;f ) £ ||f||¥  e.

Theorem.  Suppose that f has range [m,M] and f is continuous on [m,M]. If f is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a, then F = f°f is Riemann-Stiletjes integrable with respect to a.

U(P;f,a)-L(P;f,a) < d2.
U(P;F,a) - L(P;F,a)
£   
å
j Î G 
(Mj* -mj*Daj +
å
j Î B 
(Mj* -mj*Daj
£   e [a(b)-a(a)] + 2 ||F||¥  
å
j Î B 
Daj
£   e [a(b)-a(a)] + 2 ||F||¥  d  £   C  e.   ]¯]

Corollary.  If f is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a, then so is f2. Further, if g is also Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a, then the product f g is as well.

f g = ((f+g)2 -f2 -g2)/2

Corollary.  If f is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a, then so is |f|.

Defn.  A function g is said to be of  bounded variation  if for any partition P of the interval [a,b],

Varab(g) : = suppartitions P t(P,g)

is finite where t(P,g) : = åj = 1n |Dgj|.

Theorem. A function g is of bounded variation if and only if it can be decomposed as a difference (g = b-a) of two monotone nondecreasing functions.

Note. Using this decomposition, one may now extend both the definition of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral and its properties from g monotone nondecreasing to g being a function of bounded variation:

òab f dg: = òab f db- òab f da.

All the properties given in the previous lectures have their obvious analogues. We may also easily extend to the case of complex and vector valued functions with corresponding results.


Robert Sharpley March 4 1998