Theorem. Suppose that f and a are both continuous and non-decreasing, then
|
Proof. First we observe both integrals exist by our previous results. Let P be a partition
|
and set xi = xi-1, x¢i = xi, then
|
This follows from the ``summation by parts'' equation
|
We set uj = f(xj) and vj = a(xj) and chose a partition P so that both the left hand side is arbitrarily close to òab f da and the Riemann-Stieltjes sum on the right hand side is arbitrarily close to òab adf. [¯]
Theorem. If a is monotone increasing on [a,b] and f is bounded, then f is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a on[a,b] if and only if f a¢ is Riemann integrable. In this case,
|
Pf. Suppose e > 0 is arbitrary. Since a¢ is Riemann integrable, pick a partition P such that U(P,a¢)-L(P,a¢) < e. For each subinterval Ii: = [xi,xi-1], by the Mean Value Theorem there is a ti in the interval so that Dai = a¢(ti) Dxi. If si is arbitrary in Ii, then
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
By varying si, this implies
|
Using the same inequality, this estimate also holds for U(P;f a¢) - U(P;f,a). A similar argument establishes the corresponding estimate for lower sums. [¯]
Theorem. Suppose that f has range [m,M] and f is continuous on [m,M]. If f is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a, then F = f°f is Riemann-Stiletjes integrable with respect to a.
Pf. Let e > 0 be arbitary. Since f is uniformly continuous, there is a d > 0 (which we may as well assume is smaller than e) such that |f(u)-f(v)|<e if |u-v| < d. For this d pick a partition P so that
|
Let Mj, mj denote sup and inf of f respectively over the subinterval [xj-1,xj]. Similarly, define Mj*, mj* as the sup and inf of F over same subinterval. Let G be defined as the index set of ``good'' intervals where Mj - mj < d and B as the remainder where Mj - mj ³ d. For j Î G we have Mj*-mj* < e, while for j Î B there holds åj Î B Daj < d. The last estimate follows since d åj Î B Daj £ åj Î B (Mi-mi) Daj £ d2. Now we can estimate the difference between the upper and lower Riemann-Stieltjes sums of F:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Corollary. If f is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a, then so is f2. Further, if g is also Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a, then the product f g is as well.
Pf. Apply the above theorem with f(y) = y2 to establish the first statement. To establish the second, use the identity
|
and note that each term of the sum on the right hand side is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a. [¯]
Corollary. If f is Riemann-Stieltjes integrable with respect to a, then so is |f|.
Pf. Apply the above theorem with f(y) = |y|. [¯]
Defn. A function g is said to be of bounded variation if for any partition P of the interval [a,b],
Varab(g) : = suppartitions P t(P,g)
is finite where t(P,g) : = åj = 1n |Dgj|.
Theorem. A function g is of bounded variation if and only if it can be decomposed as a difference (g = b-a) of two monotone nondecreasing functions.
Pf. First define u+ = max(u,0) and u- = min(u,0) , then u = u+ +u- and |u| = u+ -u-. For a partition P of [a,x] define
p(P,x) = åj = 1n |Dgj|+
and
n(P,x) = åj = 1n |Dgj|-.
It is clear that b(x) : = suppartitions P of [a,x] p(P,x) and a(x) = suppartitions P of [a,x] -n(P,x) are nondecreasing functions. Finish by showing that g = b-a. [¯]
Note. Using this decomposition, one may now extend both the definition of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral and its properties from g monotone nondecreasing to g being a function of bounded variation:
òab f dg: = òab f db- òab f da.
All the properties given in the previous lectures have their obvious analogues. We may also easily extend to the case of complex and vector valued functions with corresponding results.